Contempt is the process in which courts hold individuals and businesses accountable for defying court orders. But there is nuance to the system that most do not know about.
In general, most judges rely on civil contempt orders (almost) exclusively. Court’s always look for a way to compel compliance with as light a touch as possible. Criminal contempt is often seen as an unsavory tool of last resort.
In the context of family law, it is highly unusual for someone to be arrested or face time behind bars. 99% of the time, escalating fines or make-up parenting time are typical contempt findings. These are usually enough to keep even the unruliest opponents in line.
Even if the court orders are bogus, you will win no favor with your presiding judge by refusing to follow orders. Even if you can somehow escape consequence (you can’t), the Judge is the decision maker in your case, and they will remember your cooperation when making final decisions in your case.
Just because courts find jail time and excessive punishments distasteful at first, this does not mean that the iron fist is beyond the court’s power. Repeatedly having contempt findings entered against a litigant will result in rapidly escalating consequences.
Clear wording: If an order is poorly worded, and there are multiple reasonable and good faith ways to interpret a parenting plan or previous decree of the court, then the court won’t punish a litigant.
Notice: If a litigant was not served with an order (and did not know about it’s existence) a court will not enter a contempt finding. The conduct at issue must be WILLFUL disobedience of the court. One can’t willfully disobey orders they did not know of.
Mistake or coincidence: Judges will generally not punish litigants if their failure to follow court orders if the disobedience was due to honest mistake, emergency, inclement weather, accident, illness, or other honest circumstance outside one’s control.
Litigants who file contempt motions get reasonable attorney’s fees awarded if they win.
What “reasonable” means is left to the sole discretion of the judge. This often results in partial attorney fee awards, even when a litigant has done everything right.
While TFLO’s are not binding upon the court’s final decision, they tend to strongly rhyme. Knowing what the court generally thinks of your arguments can be a powerful factor during final negotiations.
Clear wording: If an order is poorly worded, and there are multiple reasonable and good faith ways to interpret a parenting plan or previous decree of the court, then the court won’t punish a litigant.
Notice:
If a litigant was not served with an order (and did not know about it’s existence) a court will not enter a contempt finding. The conduct at issue must be WILLFUL disobedience of the court. One can’t willfully disobey orders they did not know of.
Mistake or coincidence:
Judges will generally not punish litigants if their failure to follow court orders if the disobedience was due to honest mistake, emergency, inclement weather, accident, illness, or other honest circumstance outside one’s control.
Simply not following the parenting plan isn’t enough. The court must enter contempt findings to get the major modification presumption. In other words: if one did not ask the court for contempt, then it did not happen.
A court will not permit you to break a court order simply because the other party is, too.
If your spouse is withholding child or spousal support, you MUST still follow the parenting plan and allow their usual parenting time. Willfully withholding the children will land you in hot water, and the other party’s failures will not be a defense.
The remedy is to file a contempt motion of your own while following all applicable orders in your case. The high road will generally impress judges, and if they sympathize with you, they will reward your patience.
An eye for an eye makes everyone blind.